BassBlaster

Is It Worth Catching a Record Fish Anymore?

Some records are better left unbroken....

Used to be said that it’d be worth a million dollars to catch the next world record largemouth. Don’t know if that was ever true, but even if it is now – which I doubt – would the baggage of a record catch be worth it?

Two recent things made that thought pop up in what’s left of my brain.

One was the potential catch and release of a Minnesota record walleye. Yeah, walleye, big deal, but bear with me here.

The guy – a fishing guide – claimed it was a potential record and apparently offered a pic and some measurements as proof. Naturally, lots of folks claimed it was bull just based on the picture alone: it wasn’t ugly enough (seriously), saggy enough, etc.

And then I tripped over this story of a guy who caught the world record hammerhead. To put that in some perspective:

> This was a lifelong (adult) quest
> The fish was 1,280 lbs and 14 feet long
> The fight lasted 5 hours and he fought it for 12 miles – so far from land that cell phones no longer worked

That was a BATTLE, dude!

But since it was so huge, naturally it was a female and when killed was “pregnant with 55 pups,” as the above article puts it.

“Pregnant” with “pups” I don’t think does justice to a maneater, but that’s the point: Internet doofuses made the guy out to be some kind of slaughterer of endangered fish and “pups.”

First of all, it’s a fish! That’s also not endangered.

So  even “the bigfoot proof,” let’s call it – need a body to prove it – won’t work for a fish.

Let’s get back to bassin. You catch a 25+ pounder and do all the right things to document it. Here’s what’ll happen:

> People won’t believe the pics, measurements and weight, and those folks will be the first ones broadcasting anything about it on the Internet besides news of the catch itself.

> Some won’t even believe if they see it swimming around alive in Bass Pro Shops.

> People will voice doubts about whether it was caught fairly and legally.

> Those doubts and other rumors will be spread by the armchair genius brigade out there and the folks who can’t wait to type things on chat rooms: “I hear….”

> Your spouse and kids will be doubted in your own hometown.

> Someone(s) will make threats – at least something like, “If that guy/gal shows up at my lake I’ll….” The worst threats will come from the animal rights nuts.

> The million bucks won’t show up, unless maybe you’re KVD, Ike, etc. and catch it in a tournament.

No thanks. I’ll be happy with a teens-weighter.

Guess if you’re gonna catch something big and tell people about it, might as well be a bigfoot. Then you actually might get that million bucks….

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Dwain

    May 16, 2012 at 3:42 pm

    I suppose this would be a good problem to have, if you made the million would also depend on what you caught it on, and how well you could market the catch.

  2. Flip'N'Pitch

    May 16, 2012 at 8:44 pm

    Ahem, ahem…this may sound a little Kung Fu Master/Rick Clunn-ish but the phrase (maybe just my own) “Excellence is its own Reward” comes to mind. 😉 So if you only want to catch a world record fish for the alleged fame and glory you will more than likely be sorely disappointed. If you want to catch a world record fish because it is an objective symbol of achieving a lifetime goal then anything else after that is just icing on the cake.

  3. Bass Pundit

    May 18, 2012 at 1:35 am

    The guy in MN with the walleye is full it and deserved to be ridiculed in my opinion. The fish was never showed against a tape, just 1 picture that doesn’t look anything like it was the size claimed. Big Fish yes, 35 inches with a 20″ in girth, not a chance.

    Just a BS fish story by a guide trying to get himself business

  4. paul zuest

    May 18, 2012 at 11:46 pm

    more proof reqiired for record than to be president

  5. Jim

    May 31, 2012 at 8:10 pm

    The search for world record bass is a waste of time. Nobody wants it to be broken and will come up with ANY excuse to not certify it. Look at the most recent one. a full ounce heavier than Perry’s fish and it is a tie. the only difference is that other people actually saw,weighed, touched etc. Karibas fish while perry’s fish is set in stone with a blurry picture and some hearsay. as far as I am concerned Kariba’s bass should be the standard to which all others should be judged only because wit the first one verified.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Gitcha Bassin' Fix

To Top